Skip to main content

Full text of "USPTO Patents Application 09930295"

See other formats


SEP 03 2002 17:28 FR 11111111111111111 111111111111 TO 342 1 U 1 34065B0 1 84 P . 02/04 

* " " Application No, 09/93H95 Docket, M4065.0X84/P184-A 

REMARKS 

Claims 25-26 and 28-34 are currently pending in the above-identified 
application. Claim 27 has been cancelled without prejudice or disclaimer to the subject 
matter recited therein and solely for the purpose of furthering the prosecution of the 
application. Applicants reserve the right to claim the subject matter of the cancelled claim 
and other claims in this or any other application. 

Claims 25 and 28-34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated 
by Heo. Reconsideration is respectfully requested. Claim 25 discloses "a semiconductor 
device package, comprising [] a metal layer formed between said semiconductor device and 
said dielectric substrate having edges formed by said dicing operation." This is an 
important feature of the invention. Heo does not teach or suggest the metal layer of the 
claimed invention. Rather, Heo provides a "multi-layer film" 20 which includes "a first 
non-conductive film 21, a second non-conductive film 22 and a circuit pattern 26." (col. 
4, lines 58-62). Thus, the metal layer of the claimed invention is not disclosed in Heo. 

The metal layer 62 in the claimed invention is not the circuit pattern, but a solid 
layer to stiffen the semiconductor device package and furthermore to be used as a heat sink 
to dissipate heat from the semiconductor device. In addition, the metal layer may be used 
as an electrical ground plane. Heo's device, i.e. die multi-layer film, does not anticipate the 
claimed invention which has a metal layer between the semiconductor device and the 
dielectric substate. Claims 28-34 should be allowable along with claim 25 and for other 


reasons. 


Claim 26 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Heo in 
view of Marcantonio. Reconsideration is respectfully requested. Claim 26 should be 
allowable along with claim 25 . Furthermore, Marcantonio does not teach or suggest a 
metal layer between the semiconductor device and the dielectric substrate but discloses a 
metal layer "on one side of the dielectric body of the package." (col. 4, lines 48-49). 
More specifically, Marcantonio provides a "heat spreader" 214 which is disposed on_a_sid£ 


2 


SEP 03 2002 17:28 FR 11111111111111111 111111111111 TO 342 1 tt 1 3406580 1 84 P . 03/04 
J 0 


Application No.: 09/930,295 


^3 


Docket No.: M4065.0184/P184-A 


opposite to that of both the integrated circuit chip 212 and the dielectric layers 224, 226, 
228 (col. 4, lines 41-67). Marcantonio would suffer from the drawbacks of the prior art 
described in Applicant's specification on page 2, namely, a package without sufficient 
stiffness. 

In view of the above, each of the presendy pending claims in this application is 
believed to be in immediate condition for allowance. Accordingly, the Examiner is 
respectfully requested to withdraw the outstanding rejection of the claims and to pass this 
application to issue. 


Dated: September 3, 2002 



Respectfully submitted, 

Mark J. Thronson 

Registration No.: 33,082 
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & 

OSHINSKY LLP 
2101 L Street NW 
Washington, DC 20037-1526 
(202) 785-9700 
Attorneys for Applicant 


3